Radical Islam's End Game
Frank Salvato, Director of Terrorism
Research
To look at the situations in Iraq and Gaza as separate
conflicts is to view them in a naďve and overly simplistic way. True, the
battles taking place in Gaza are more akin to a civil war, if in fact a
civil war can take place without a recognized country to govern. And the
battles taking place in Iraq are almost completely instigated at the hands
of al Qaeda terrorists hell-bent on creating chaos with violence while
destroying any chance of democracy in that nation. But what the less
visionary among us are deficient in understanding and neglectful or
deceitful in not addressing is the reason they are fighting, their goal,
their end-game.Many anti-war
activists and members of the American Fifth Column insist that the reason
radical Islamist terrorists – insurgents or militants as they like to call
them – have taken to jihad against the United States and the West is because
of the encroachment of our culture into the 7th Century Middle Eastern
culture in which they exist. They point to
Osama bin Laden’s 1996 fatwa against the US and the West citing the
presence of Western military personnel and installations as the catalyst for
al Qaeda’s Islamofascist aggression.
While these points may very well be the
justification used by the cadre of terrorist organizations
originating throughout the Middle East for attacks against the West, it
doesn’t explain their propensity for Arab on Arab, Muslim on Muslim
violence. It doesn’t explain the original catalyst for the conflict between
Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims and it certainly doesn’t address the
Islamofascists’ goals.
The specifics surrounding the original
cause for
conflict between Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims are disputed by both camps.
But both factions concede that it stems from a disagreement over the direct
succession to Mohammed, to the Caliph. This subject requires more space than
can be afforded here. What can be addressed here is the “end-game.”
That Islamofascist aggression advanced
through the use of terrorism is taking place around the world against
members of every faith other than Islam is a testimony to the fact
that radical fundamentalist Islamists are engaged in an intentional conflict
of global conquest. Terrorist attacks in the name of Islam have taken place
in Israel, Iraq, Lebanon, Spain, Britain, Indonesia, Thailand, the
Philippines, Somalia, Algeria, Sudan, South America and the United States –
to cite a short list – against, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and even
conformist and non-fundamentalist Islamists.
When one examines the facts and
logistics of Islamofascist aggression – both in history and modern times –
it is hard to argue that the basis for this aggression is Western influence
on the Islamic culture. If this were the sole reason for Islamofascist
aggression there would be no excuse for attacks in the name of Islam on the
Hindus or Buddhists or in any nation that doesn’t embrace Western values
such as Thailand, Somalia or most of Indonesia. Yet, the slaughter of
innocents in the name of Islam does take place against these people and in
these non-Westernized regions.
By acknowledging these facts – and they
are indisputable – we can dismiss the argument that the US and the West have
brought the wrath of Islamofascism upon ourselves, which is the basis for
the argument used by the anti-war movement, the American Fifth Column and
disingenuous and opportunistic politicians.
What, then, is the catalyst for
Islamofascist aggression and what could be so powerful as to produce legions
of suicide bombers and those willing to die, without reservation, for their
cause?
While the many elements of this subject
are complex, together they indicate an overall agenda that is not.
In almost every declaration and action
of the Islamofascist, from Osama bin Laden to Hassan Nasrallah, Ayman al
Zawahri to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the goal is the same: the successful
establishment of a global Islamic state – or Caliphate – ruled under Sharia
Law. This notion is not a supposition on my part. Rather, it is an accurate
observation, based on understanding and acknowledging the actions taken and
the words used by each of these fascist leaders (note the correct usage of
the word
fascist).
In his
1996 fatwa, Osama bin Laden proclaimed:
“. . .O you horses (soldiers) of
Allah ride and march on. This is the time of hardship so be tough. And know
that your gathering and co-operation in order to liberate the sanctities of
Islam is the right step toward unifying the word of the Ummah under the
banner of ‘No God but Allah’. . .Our Lord, shatter their gathering, divide
them among themselves, shaken the earth under their feet and give us control
over them. . .”
It should be noted that to bin Laden,
the Ummah is considered a figurative nation comprised of all Muslims
and all Islamic nations.
In
2000 bin Laden declared:
“. . .Afghanistan is the only country
in the world that has the Shari'ah. Therefore, it is compulsory upon Muslims
all over the world to help Afghanistan. And to make hijra to this land,
because it is from this land that we will dispatch our armies to smash all
kuffar all over the world.”
In October of 2005, during
his address to the United Nations, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
said:
“From the beginning of time, humanity
has longed for the day when justice, peace, equality and compassion envelop
the world.”
And in a
speech to Friday prayer leaders he said:
“Our revolution’s main mission is to
pave the way for the reappearance of the 12th Imam, the Mahdi.”
It should be noted here that Ahmadinejad
believes – as do most Shi’ites – that
the 12th Imam (or Muhammad al-Mahdi), according to their interpretation
of the Quran, will bring “peace and justice on earth” by establishing Islam
throughout the world. This equivalent of the “second coming” would take
place when the world has fallen into chaos and civil war emerges between the
human race for no reason.
If we are to take the leaders of the
Islamofascist movement at their word – and the leaders of the United States
and the West have been delinquent in accepting the declarations of fascists
in the past, so much so that world war has ensued – we can only surmise that
the battles taking place between Sunni and Shi’ite factions in Iraq, Gaza
and elsewhere in the world are for dominance in what they perceive as an
inevitable global Islamic Caliphate.
It is crucial that the United States
government – and all the governments of the West – dispense with the
political infighting that currently holds hostage national unity and the
collective will, so we can defend ourselves from the inevitable full-scale
confrontation with an emboldened and strengthening Islamofascist movement.
The first step to achieving this unity is an
honest, comprehensive understanding of the enemy. The education to
achieve that end must begin immediately.
Make no mistake. We are essentially
re-visiting the ominous days of 1938. It took everything that the freedom
loving people of the world could muster to vanquish evil then. This time we
may not be so lucky. This time the forces of evil will have nuclear
capability.
Sources:
Fascist Merriam-Webster
Osama bin Laden's 1996 Fatwa PBS News Hour
President Ahmadinejad's 2005 Speech at UN General Assembly
GlobalSecurity.org
"The Pious Caliphate Will Start From Afghanistan": Is al-Qaeda's Long-Held
Afghan Strategy Now Unfolding? Jamestown Foundation
The 12th Imam Wikipedia
Understanding Ahmadinejad ThreatsWatch.org
Related Reports,
Studies & Testimonies:
The 9/11 Commission Report
Site Institute
Beyond al-Qaeda - Part 1: The
Global Jihadist Movement RAND Corporation
Beyond al-Qaeda - Part 2: The
Outer Rings of the Terrorist Universe RAND
Corporation
External Signs of Radicalization and Jihadist Militancy
Javier Jordan & Fernando M. Manas,
University of Granada (Spain)
Terrorism & the Internet:
Hezbollah's Use of the Internet to Distrubute Anti-Western Incitement
Center for Special Studies
US Counterterrorism Strategy Must Address Ideological,
Political Factors RAND Corporation |